Why would the PS3 finishing in last place, not first, be a bad thing?

[richardhutnik]

RolStoppable said:

richardhutnik said:

RolStoppable said:

Correct. And that's what this thread is about as well, right?

It is more of a question of asking why the PS3 coming in last (third) is a bad thing, rather than it NOT coming in first.   The PS3 has different possible issues then the 360 coming in third.

I think you meant to write "second" in the thread title, not "first". Everything would make much more sense that way.

I understand this.  I did want to offer people a chance to discuss the PS3 coming in first.  I also posted it because the PS3 was forecast by everyone pretty much to be the top-selling console before this generation fully started, and the PS2 was the top console last generation.