Namco vs. Tecmo vs. Konami

[SHMUPGurus]

Zizzla_Rachet said:

SHMUPGurus said:

Zizzla_Rachet said:

Namco has a bigger and Broader hand in the Games biz...And since they are with Bandai now...Konami..LOL what can I say.....Great DS games a series of CastleVania flops on N64 and Ps2....and they only like to be linked to sony in terms of big production games....While TEMCO has been around for a while they have a small portfolio of IP's..

So here it is...
Namco=Win
Konami=Fail
Temco=has a long way to go...

Yes I know Sokuiden is a masterpiece..I love it too

You do know that Konami started in the NES era (and even before that)? Castlevania is not the only game franchise they created, and even if they made two bad games for it, they made a lot of other great quality titles. And so what if they like to be linked to Sony in terms of big production games? Does it make their games bad?

I'm not saying you can't have an opinion, but it's kind of a weird way of thinking.

My pick was Namco becuase they have games I like more...I'm 29 years old ...I know Konami is from the NES days and what not I had a few of their games on my NES and I even had Symphony of the Night on Sega Saturn..I also had both tittles of the RPG I spelled wrong...But Namco takes it for me...The Thread said vs. So i said Konami loses...Thats what the OP asked for to Pick one...as far as Tecmo goes...Well some people here never played Tecmo Bowl....Hmmmm...

And so what if they like to be linked to Sony in terms of big production games? Does it make their games bad?

No it does not..I bought a PS1 to play MGS...But they could develop on a broader Scale...The MS brand is not Sega....

I understand that Konami is not your number one developer/publisher, but it's just the way you put it that I didn't like. Konami is not a "bad" or "lol-worthy" company is all I'm saying. They contributed a lot to the gaming world (got along with the arcade movement and more), let's not forget this! =P

And what do you mean by the MS brand is not Sega?