Welcome BLUERAY -- Bye Bye BLUERAY

[thetonestarr]

Words Of Wisdom said:

thetonestarr said:

Words Of Wisdom said:

thetonestarr said:

Solid state drives (AKA high-content flash storage) are far less reliable and far, FAR less time-proof than holographic storage. Holographic storage is a concept proven to be usable decades past write-date. Hard-drives become corrupt FAR before then, and flash memory isn't much more reliable than that.

Please supply links and other evidence to support this claim.

Besides the common sense aspect?

I don't think you quite understand. 

Here's how it works:

1) You make a claim (I will bold it for you). 
2) I ask for proof of your claim.
3) You provide informative and interesting articles for me to read which prove your claim.

I don't give a flying fart about your argument with Ail or Blu-ray, but I would be interested in articles regarding holographic storage.

Here's how it worked:

(1) I made a claim. You bolded it for me.

(2) You asked for proof of my claim.

(3) I provided links detailing what I referred to.

(4) You overlooked them and concentrated on only the first line, which falls under the category of "other evidence", which you also asked for.

:)

 

Ail: I do admit your point in that extra space for developers is counterintuitive. However, most home users prefer additional storage space not for ridiculous programs that take up an enormous amount of space, but rather for storing loads and loads of media. I, for instance, have about 1.4TB of space currently held up by an ENORMOUS collection of songs, television shows, and movies. The everyday consumer wishes to be able to do the same - and that is why greater amounts of space are preferable... for the consumer. Developers, yes, should always learn to do more with less. Given that I have a vague amount of amateur development experience (and a bit of schooling... nothing to brag about, enough to understand), I know the benefits of this. And I agree, on that note.