Why third-parties always find an excuse to not work on Nintendo systems?

[Omega_Phazon_Pirate.]

Derek said:

theRepublic said:

Derek said:
The only third party games that turn profits (for the most part) are mini-game compilations, or something with a Mario cameo.

More expensive, "artistic", and arguably "better" games cost more money to make, and have been barely breaking even. See: Madworld, No More Heroes. Exception: anything with Resident Evil in the title.

Until Wii owners start buying these games, I wouldn't expect things to change.

Madworld and No More Heroes were not expensive games.

They were more expensive than Pets, Horsez, or *insert mini-game compilation here*.

 

Except Sega and Rising Stars (European publisher) were satisfied with Madworld and NMH sales (in fact RS was thrilled with the sales).  Probably because the cost is generally much less to make for the Wii than HD. 

And you ask what your sig has to do with this... usually when someone sees that in one's sig, that implies to them that you may be a sony fanboy (not saying you are one), although in my sig my 3 fav games this gen are all Wii games n_n, so I guess I'm not one to talk :P.