By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
LordTheNightKnight said:
MikeB said:
@ sieanr

And before MikeB pops in here to say the PS3 could pull this off, it cant.


Technically I think the PS3 is powerful enough to render a game like Halo 3 in 1080p at 60 FPS together with additional effects, with twice the content, higher quality 7.1 audio and localization on a single disc.

But that would be a mammoth undertaking and involve a complete game engine redesign from scratch. Maybe 3rd generation PS3 (SPE optimised, harddrive caching and texture streaming enabled) first and second party game engines will start to perform at such levels.

 True that later PS3 (and likely 360) games could do that, but for now, this is how far developers can push the systems.


IMO you are overestimating the technical possibilities of the XBox 360. 7.1 audio and fitting all of that content on a single disc is technically impossible on the XBox 360.

IMO there are also too many hardware limitations to make a FPS game like Halo 3 running at 1080p/60FPS feasible on the XBox 360. IMO 720p is the optimal resolution for XBox 360 FPS games, pushing for 60 frames per second will probably prove to be quite a challenge and I wouldn't be surprised UT3 will eventually be 30 FPS on the 360, though Epic would be the best developing company to make this happen.



Naughty Dog: "At Naughty Dog, we're pretty sure we should be able to see leaps between games on the PS3 that are even bigger than they were on the PS2."

PS3 vs 360 sales