Thing is when I talk about best graphics, I mean the result of what I see on screen. Not what has more polys. To me the biggest thing that makes an image or game look more real is the use of colour. I personally think that the mix of vibrancy with grittiness makes PGR4 more real for me. Like KZ2. It looks real because of it's great use of grittiness. GT5P does look to clean, which takes away the realsim look. At times it's awesome. But it's only an opinion. PGR4's use of grey sky's, wet effect vehicles, water on the windscreen makes extra realism. And they have done the lighting for these conditions pwefectly.
|
You can obviously have your opinion. If you would prefer Mario Kart graphics to GT5P it would be fair enough, but in objective terms, I believe GT5P looks the best. Things like poly count, lighting and textures matter, if still for some reason you prefer how a car looks on another game with less polygons (that is detail), worst lighting, etc. that is your personal opinion and may be respected, but I don't think you can claim it looks better objectively. Still if you are happier with PGR4 graphics I don't need to convince you of the contrary, I guess, just enjoy it.
