chukster90 said:
rocketpig said:
kowenicki said: @rocketpig
Or people have to figure a way of working smarter and with more imagination. I refuse to believe that the scenarios you paint are the only two.
If you want to compare to movies then lets.... how much did the biggest Oscar winner this year cost to make compared to the normal Hollywood blockbuster......? a fraction! |
I'm sorry, I forgot that with each award, a movie is automatically delivered profit. Some Oscar winners have failed miserably financially.
I believe in working smarter and with more imagination but again, your point fails. Why work that way over one platform when you could achieve the same result over two or three with marginally more effort? The risk is minimized and the rewards are maximized. In a world where even some of the least "impressive" graphic games run into the millions spent (LBP), why opt for that kind of restriction unless you're being funded by the manufacturer?
|
Are you honestly saying that LBP has poor graphics? GTFO.
|
Yeah, that's what I said. Graphically, it's impressive. Given the context of the environments, not so much. It's not a bad looking game by any sense of the imagination, it's just not that technically impressive. It's basically a 2D scroller rendered in 3D. It looks great but it's hard to say that it pushes the hardware in any way.