By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Tyrannical said:
The Ghost of RubangB said:
It is possible to argue that it is ineffective and morally wrong.


Argument #1: Whether it works or not, it is un-American and morally wrong.

Argument #2: Whether it's morally acceptable or not, it doesn't work.

 You can also argue that it is effective and morally right.

The needs of the  many (the lives saved by averting a terrorist attack) out way the needs of the few (the terrorist being tortured). You could also further argue that sacrficing the rights of the unjust terrorists saves the lives of completely innocent people that were in no way involved with the torture.

You were telling akuma to pick an argument.  I was just pointing out that he didn't need to because they were separate arguments.  Apparently you already knew this and were just flamebaiting as usual.  Carry on.