nojustno said:
Soleron said:
nojustno said: ...
That's exactly what I was thinking, though we've been surprised enough times in this industry. It's entirely possible for GT300 to be like 2.5 x faster seeing how it's a new architecture and all. I hope not though, nvidia really needs a good kick in the balls. Being dominated by ATI for a while would be good for their innovation.
|
Well, they were. From June to January AMD had the best value at almost all price points. You know what happened? AMD and Nvidia's market share stayed the same at 30% and 20% respectively. Because of ignorant consumers who don't check the PC specs before they buy, and Nvidia's superior marketing.
|
are you referring to this?
http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/showthread.php?t=223256
yeah it's a shame. It can only be fixed if AMD really dominates a gen like nvidia did with G80. Unfortunately such a gen is rare.
|
Yes. Nvidia's been making a lot of engineering mistakes recently (overheating G80/G92s; 55nm and 40nm GT200 shrinks being delayed massively; being forced to do an X2 part they probably lose money on) so I hope ATI can win the next gen outright.