outlawauron said:
I'm pretty he was talking about the consumer reception and not the reception of 30 year old manchildren. |
I thought we were talking about the quality of said IP's? Afterall the discussion here seems to be that over exposure of franchises leads to reduced quality of said franchise games. CGI then used examples of new IP's that have been far less well received than most established franchise games and made a point of implying that Nintendo has been creating good quality new IP's. But the exact opposite is true, while they enjoy massive sales they have been critically panned by most reviewers as modiocre to low quality titiles.
Maybe I'm missing point, but what's the point of brining up Nintendo's new IP's if none of them are actually considered good?








