yo_john117 said:
Like i said your one of those GT fanboys that won't even try forza simply because it doesn't have the name Gran Turismo. And fyi GT and Forza 3 are basically the same damn thing wether you like it or not. And about the bolded...its true, if a game can get above a 90 then they obviously did do something right....that brings us right back to the name. So here's using your logic: A gaming studio makes a GTA sanbox type of game. It scores two points less on metacritic then GTA4. It sells good but doesn't sell even close to GTA4 numbers Does that mean the game is greatly inferior?? No it doesn't. They obviously are about as good as each other. And the only reason why the game doesn't sell like GTA4 is because it doesn't have the name. Also with your logic if the said GTA-like game scored much higher than GTA4, it would still be greatly inferior to GTA4. You and I both know that is complete bogus. So can you please just take those fanboy glasses off??
|
First probelm with your thinking is you take game scores way to litteraly.
And yes a game can be 9.5 yet still far inferior to GTA, rockstar has perfected the way the make these games. Few devs are on that level. Rockstar and sandbox games is like PD and racers like Miyamoto and platformers or maybe you will undersdtand this better like Bungie and FPS.
Fact is great games sale great, Gears1 Halo1 GT1 all sold great due to their quality they had no great established name to carry them.
Universal reviews and sales show GT to be the best, and as far as name look at Need for speed kid. One of the biggest franchises once is not a joke. With out quality name means NOTHING.
and fyi id guess to you a M3 and Accord are the same dame thing.







