TheRealMafoo said:
Fair enough. My personal perspective is I agree with our founding fathers. Our form of government was put into place to protect its people from the good intentions of man. |
You love talking about the Constitution without actually citing to anything in the Constitution don't you?
You are mistaking fear of one type of government for another. How many provisions in the Bill of Rights have to do with protections for criminals, such as the detainees, versus how many have to do with protection from the government raising your taxes and taking property? I count 13 vs. 4. So if any President walks all over the rights in the Bill of Rights, it is one who dispels with the protections afforded to criminals, as there are significantly more of those.
The Constitution was made compared to the Articles of Confederacy as the government did not have ENOUGH power to raise taxes under the previous form of government. So if anything, you have things completely backwards. The Framers wanted to give the government more power than they previously had to raise taxes.
- First Amendment – Establishment Clause, Free Exercise Clause; freedom of speech, of the press, Freedom of Religion, and of assembly; right to petition,
- Third Amendment – Protection from quartering of troops.
- Fourth Amendment – Protection from unreasonable search and seizure.
- Sixth Amendment – Trial by jury and rights of the accused; Confrontation Clause, speedy trial, public trial, right to counsel
- Seventh Amendment – Civil trial by jury.
- Eighth Amendment – Prohibition of excessive bail and cruel and unusual punishment.
- Ninth Amendment – Protection of rights not specifically enumerated in the Bill of Rights.
- Tenth Amendment – Powers of States and people.
We had two bags of grass, seventy-five pellets of mescaline, five sheets of high-powered blotter acid, a salt shaker half full of cocaine, a whole galaxy of multi-colored uppers, downers, screamers, laughers…Also a quart of tequila, a quart of rum, a case of beer, a pint of raw ether and two dozen amyls. The only thing that really worried me was the ether. There is nothing in the world more helpless and irresponsible and depraved than a man in the depths of an ether binge. –Raoul Duke
It is hard to shed anything but crocodile tears over White House speechwriter Patrick Buchanan's tragic analysis of the Nixon debacle. "It's like Sisyphus," he said. "We rolled the rock all the way up the mountain...and it rolled right back down on us...." Neither Sisyphus nor the commander of the Light Brigade nor Pat Buchanan had the time or any real inclination to question what they were doing...a martyr, to the bitter end, to a "flawed" cause and a narrow, atavistic concept of conservative politics that has done more damage to itself and the country in less than six years than its liberal enemies could have done in two or three decades. -Hunter S. Thompson







