wfz said:
ctk495 said:
iclim4 said:
Akvod said:
I don't know... I don't want to have a GF/Wife based completely off of sex... but when I want to have sex, I want to have it with someone hot.
I hope I don't sound really cynical, but I don't think "true love" exists, which is romantic love completely independent of sex. Why do we only "fall in love" with people within our sexual orientation (is that worded right?)? Het. Men will only go for women. Vice Versa. Gay men will only go for men, and gay women will only for women.
You could point at old couples, and how most couples don't even have sex anymore, but I (without any scientific knowledge or proof) believe that it's more based on obligation, and at those stages, the love isn't the traditional "romantic love", but almost like the love you have for friends and families. You love someone only because they're familiar to you.
|
My explanation centers on instinct and that doesn't cover the mindset of marriage. Just wanted to give my 2 cents on why there's a double standard on guys being cool and girls being sluts.
And your view on love is very cold. I still believe in it, that true love exists, but I'm open to the possibility that it may simply be because of my naivity. I'd talk more but I gtg.
|
That is probably the most emo statement ever,and you accuse me of being a girl,lol.
|
Believing in true love means you're Emo?
What the hell? I haven't been paying attention to the Emo fad in the past few years, but last I checked, that wasn't in the definition at all.
I'm very much into true love, but I think it's a bit broader than only 1 person in the entire world. :P I do however strongly believe in being faithful, and I'd love nothing more than to be with one amazing girl for the rest of my life. That's what I've been looking for and what I'll continue looking for. I'm also a sucker for cute love stories, what can I say?
|
Yep it has evolve over the course of time and now the term has a broader meaning.
