Killergran said:
This isn't really how it works, and you know it. It's an emotional argument that is true in the short run, but not in the long run. It's true that piracy shifts money away from the entertainment industries, but the ones who suffers in the long run is the end users that no longer get as highquality software/media as before. Not the gamemaker that went on to build houses instead. Society as a whole, I argue (and you probably don't) most likely comes out of it richer than it would without piracy. And now I'm going to really go out on a limb here... I haven't thought this through yet, but it has been troubling me.
|
Wow, and your an economics major? :)
We don't NEED entertainment, we want it. It's why it's called entertainment. It's things that make us happy. We want new entertainment because we like new things.
As for the "Society as a whole, I argue (and you probably don't) most likely comes out of it richer than it would without piracy."
This is the same argument against a socialist economy vs a capitalist one...
The best video game ever made, has yet to be made. The best movie ever made, has yet to be made. The best song ever written, has yet to be written. If you remove the ability to make a profit, the people who make these games/movies/music, will stop making them.
Music is debatable, but definitely the other two aren't.
Because there is less money in it, less entertainment exists in the world, and due to that, I say Society as a whole, I argue (and you probably don't) most likely comes out of it poorer than it would without piracy.