| TheRealMafoo said:
Your both missing the point. let's put it another way. Let's say you traveled the world, and ranked treatment yourself. You had a scale of 1 to 100 as what the best experience in a hospital was. Let's say you were to go to Costa Rica, and of all the hospitals in the world, you ranked them at a 20 and everyone in that country got the same healthcare. Now you come to the US, and the worst treatment (someone with no health insurance) you ranked as a 40, and the best medical care, you ranked as a 90. The worst person in the US got twice a good of healthcare then the Costa Rican people, but on that list, Costa Rica will get a higher score because they all got the same shitty care. That's not how it should work in my opinion. |
In this very point you are right, but just if you assume, that everybody really gets that health care. If people don't, then I must ask you how you would wage every death, because of not getting the proper treatment needed for money reasons. If a serious illness is on the way to take your life and the 20% standard would safe you, your choice would be obvious.
By the way: I know not one country except for Cuba on that list, which doesn't have a private medical sector as well. So your assumption that everybody's getting the same treatment is wrong anyway.
@akuma:
I hope you'll tell us what each graph means in particular 
