vlad321 said:
@Rpruett You still haven't even read the source, just some biased interpretation. Either put your money where your mouth is and stop being an idiot or gtfo of this thread.
|
I've read the source several times now. I'm the first person in the thread to even mention the source and various aspects about it. I've also been saying for pages that this study is clearly subjective, prone to bias, impossible to interpret and that's the driving reason WHY the World Health Organization has said it's "Too Complex" to derive rankings anymore.
Want to know why it's "Too Complex" ? Putting in a ranking system with their criteria like they have is so incredibly statistically invalid it's amazing. The fact that you fail acknowledge this is absolutely hilarious.
Stick to what you know Francis, or what you think you know.
