akuma587 said:
That was the example you already gave...and Obama is already taking steps to address this problem because it is a problem that needs to be fixed. I agree that it should be fixed. But at the same time people yell and scream that the government is "rationing" healthcare. I guess its OK if insurance companies do it but not if the government does. I never really did understand that. |
And it's still a valid unadressed point.
Also The problem is. Companies don't do that.
They give you differing plans and you get to choose what you think you may or may not need. You can pick and choose your healthcare.
You would be able to do this even more except there are government regulations so that you can't get partial coverage for some stuff... for example thanks to regulations... even if you have no history of heart disease and eat heart healthy, you can't cut out money by saving on the "heart insurance."
Either way... if a private company says "we aren't going to pay for this anymore" you can say "Ok. I'm out." and leave.
What the government does is decide what healthcare coverage you get... without you having any imput. Meaning you have to pay for it... yet have no say... and if you can't get what you want... your screwed... unless your rich enough at this point to pay for the treatment yourself.
Which is much more expesnive then private insurance. Furthermore private insurance is much more expensive... and when you pay out of pocket for anything National Healthcare governments drop you and you can't get treatment paid for anymore. Additionally you have less money to pay for anything because you've been forced to pay for it all this time.








