Pirate Bay Judge Accused of Bias, Calls for a Retrial

[vaio]

Dinomax said:

vaio said:

Dinomax said:

Get a clue!!!

 

Ok *reads on whole situation.*  Huh, Swedish police arrest guys who run torrent site on the internet due to mass copyright infringement, trialed, found guilty.

Wow, downloading content you didn't pay for is a crime, learn something new everyday.  If your all so confident that its not, go tell the police you do so. 

 

 

If you had a clue you would know they were freed of thoose charges, in fact they were dropped on the first day, as I said get a clue.

To help you out I can inform you that we have a thread on this very site with the links to and about the trial go and read it and come back.

1-It´s not illigal to run a torrent tracker, it´s not illegal to link to torrents and thats all theese guys are guilty of nothing else.

2-They haven´t uploaded anything, it´s the users that do that IF you want to go after them them I am with you there is the problem not TPB or their crew.

3-Hell if I search for a movie on TPB if will find it in their Index by soeone that has uploaded it there, but if I do the same on google I get mass links to all kinds of torrentsites that I never even heard of with the same movie. Now if TPB is quilty of what they were found guilty of (not what you thought they were found guilty of) then every search engine on the net that points you to a torrent are just as guilty.

Nice try though let´s see if you can handle a second round.

 

4-Edit: At the bolded you forgot to add the police that were payed of buy the Hollywood people ran the investigation and arrested the TPB crew.

 

1- So why were they arrested under mass copyright infringement?  Oopsie thats what torrents on there site was!

2- Funny did you know its a crime to be in possession of stolen goods?  Which funnily enough there site was swimming in it.

3- Sadly no, because search engines are what they are, search engines, most popular sites are picked up.  Pirate bay is a torrent tracker, torrent searcher, torrent hoster.  Which breaks copyright infridgement laws. 

4- Paid for a job well done, they nabbed them!

 

 1. If you had a clue you would have known that more then half the charges were dropped the first day of trial (hell even in the first 2 hours) and they weren´t convicted for masscopyright infrigment since thoose charges were dropped the first day.( This is the second time i write this how about some reading comprehension and do some research about the trial instead of spouting nonsense?)

2. They were in possesion of torrents which are not copyright material and thats why thoose charges were dropped the 1st day.

3. TPB is a search engine connected to their own torrent tracker and none of thoose are illegal here and again I rpeat my self thats why copyright infrigment charges were dropped. The laws you are refering to may or may not hold true in your country (i am guessing you are american) but as the trial proved the 1st day it´s not illegal here. Uploading copyright material is illegal but hosting torrents or a tracker isn´t.

4. That is so sad that i feel sorry for you, so obviously you think it´s right to break the law to catch someone that might have broken the law?

Nice try are you up for round 3?