Is Halo reponsable for many good games today ? Yes or No ?

[lestatdark]

Lostplanet22 said:

lestatdark said:

Lostplanet22 said:

ithis said:
^^ Because it was labeled a Halo killer? I doubt there were no shooters for the consoles before Halo, so there would have been shooters for the consoles without Halo.

Half, it was very clear that after the succes of Halo that Sony wanted to have an FPS aswell for the PS2.

 

 

 Erm....you're wrong. Red Faction released at the same time for the PS2, so the FPS genre was on the PS2 at the same time. It just wasn't as succesfull as Halo, but Halo wasn't the impulsor for FPS on a sony console, it was the success of FPS on computers that had sony gunning for a succesfull console FPS

 

 An succesfull FPS like Halo =p.

Perhaps you're right, but that's more the case with the PS3 that it was with the PS2, because the only main FPS the console had was Call of Duty, Medal of Honor, Red Faction and Black. It wasn't the FPS competitor that it is now with the PS3. IMO, the first Resistance is the best FPS i've seen in a Sony Console and it was a good step forward from what they did with the PS2