starcraft said:
WessleWoggle said:
starcraft said:
I just read your last post.
As I said above, you are clearly incapable of even beginning to comprehend a position that deviates remotely from your own. You continue to assert that different rights exist under the model I propose. They do not.
You continue to assert that you are being "fair" and I am not. You are incorrect.
You seem to be making the assumption that because the majority agrees with something they are necessarily biased, you are wrong.
Frankly, your entire posting line seems to fall in with what MrStickBall is saying. You're not truly caught up on marriage. You're fighting for acceptance. And your aim is misplaced.
|
Tell me why protecting people's silly feelings towards a tradition is more important than equal rights.
Get off your high horse, stop insulting me, and ACTUALLY USE LOGIC TO ARGUE.
I don't give A FUCK if they accept anything. I just want EQUAL RIGHTS.
WHY IS PROTECTING PEOPLES FEELINGS MORE IMPORTANT THAN EQUAL RIGHTS?
|
Again you are missing the point. Under the system I refer too, you have equal rights.
What you want is more rights. Even assuming that weren't the case, if you actually didn't give a "FUCK," you wouldn't have bothered replying.
Protecting the integrity of an institution that plays a dominant role in the lives of the vast majority of humans that inhabit the earth is more important than a meaningless and impractical piece of political oneupmanship.
|
As a homosexual I do not have the right to marry someone I'm attracted to, straight people do. How is that equal rights?
How is asking for the same right straight people get, asking for more rights?
WTF? Meaningless? The meaning IS EQUAL RIGHTS. It's not oneupsmanship, it's about equality.
