| Legend11 said: It took me all of 1 minute 10 seconds to find details of the Metroid Prime 3 review embargo which is likely more research than you did for your post. The fact that you mentioned embargoes when Nintendo is notorious for being one of the most secretive and controlling with it's information in the world is laughable. Anyways here are some links to actually back up what I've just said: http://wii.gamespy.com/wii/metroid-prime-3/814750p2.html "We're going to wrap things up here as we've got another 80 percent of the game to hack through before the review embargo lifts at 12:01 a.m. PST on Monday morning. Wish us luck! All signs are pointing to Corruption being the best of the three Prime games so check back for the final results early next week. " Do you have evidence of a low score embargo? (Were you the person who originally insinuated that there was one with Metroid Prime 3?) There's a difference between blocking ALL reviews until a certain time and blocking all BAD reviews until a certain time, as was done with Madden this year. Metroid news was ridiculously coordinated, though. Nintendo embargoed previews until a certain date, and then only allowed coverage on the first 1/3 of the game, and then embargoes reviews. Coordination is shady enough.
As for your other points, why single out EA and Microsoft when so many others do it as well? Hell some reviewers get to go through special training camps taught by former special forces personnel, others have gotten free trips to Hawaii, Russia, Las Vegas, Montreal, etc, and others get signed copies or extremely rare merchandise that would easily go for hundreds if not thousands of dollars on Ebay, and this has been going on since the 80s, and you decide to now proclaim that the system is broken? That's laughable at well. Don't get me wrong I don't condone any of that but to single out EA and Microsoft when it's an industry wide problem really does make you look like just a fanboy. Sorry for not getting on this as soon as I was born. Why did I "single out" these companies (including Sony and Nintendo too, btw)? Because they were recent, high profile examples. D'uh. I'm glad you don't condone this stuff. There's no reason to be dismissive of this thread, then, so I'll assume I misread you. You should go one step further and help to highlight some of the BS.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/07/02/AR2007070201743.html "In his career as a game reviewer, Ghislain Masson has been to Russia twice, and once to Chernobyl for a promotion of a computer game set in that area's nuclear meltdown zone. His other junkets include trips to India paid for by Microsoft and a five-day extravaganza in Las Vegas funded by Midway. There was also the shindig near his home base in Paris to promote a game in the Rayman series that included juggling lessons from circus performers." Oh, thanks
|
"[Our former customers] are unable to find software which they WANT to play."
"The way to solve this problem lies in how to communicate what kind of games [they CAN play]."
Satoru Iwata, Nintendo President. Only slightly paraphrased.
