t S.T.A.G.E. said:
Sony keeps reiterating themselves. They knew selling PS3's at drastically low prices with BR in it was going to be a slow process if they wanted profit. It still is a double edged sword, you just refuse to see it because of your loyalty. I have no loyalty to gaming companies, because I am the type of person who purchases what I like without need of attachment. Sony isn't pioneering crap with Blu Ray. The PS3 was a sacrifice to save Blu Ray when so many companies were investing in it and weren't seeing profit. Don't ever say BR cannot be pirated, because it can and everyone who cares to do it will eventually have the knowledge, similarly to the PS2. Sony cripped themselves by trying to force a dying product that wasn't needed into the market. HD-DVD died and Blu Ray should've gone with it in the natural scheme of things. Blu Ray is just another DVD with more space. There is nothing special about it in the long run. |
What are you talking about BD is the same as DVD? Not even fucking close.
1. DVDs use an angle read, meaning it has a variable read speed, and only keeps around 60-70% it's max speed.
2. BD use a direct on angle, which allows for constant 100% disc read speed.
3. BD has an extra coating for resistance.
4. BD reads 4 times faster then DVD.(1x BD = 4.5X DVD)
5. It uses a blue diode(so did HD-DVD) that has 2 lenses, at A MUCH higher density, meaning it can literally read through any scratch, if it can even be scratched with the extra layer of scratch resistant material.
Hell I could list hundreds of more differences.
DVD took over VHS, just as VHS took over beta. BD takes over DVD, what do you think is wrong with that?
