| Ascended_Saiyan3 said: @slowmo I see you are living up to your name. Try to keep up. |
I've disproved your lame theories many times before mate then you either run away from the discussion or no doubt as you'll do now hit the report button in a effort to hide the fact you lost the debate. Mandatory install are never a positive for the Bluray drive and given all almost the entire 360 catalogue could be installed to the HDD with and benefit form the super quick access times its certainly not a selling point for the PS3.
It doesn't matter how many times you replicate data onto your bluray drive, that only decreases seak time, in terms of pure reading throughput the DVD drive is faster. You can band around all the averages claims you like but you cannot hide from the fact that the data that needs streaming fastest will be stored in the fastest areas and as such will be read from the disk quicker than with a 2X Bluray drive. Putting replications of data on a Bluray drive will not increase its throughput and organising the image better helps less than on the 360 because of the fact it reads consistantly across the entire disk.
I see you and Mike moved the goal posts across to trying to proclaim the advantages of HDD installations now, do we take it you've lost this argument and are now making excuses for the lesser performance of the Bluray drive in the PS3.
