By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Ascended_Saiyan3 said:
NJ5 said:
Ascended_Saiyan3 said:
NJ5 said:

Regarding point 3, I think what Squilliam is saying is that no 360 game requires a mandatory install, while plenty of PS3 games do, so 360's drive is at least not worse than the PS3's. I don't think he's saying that it's necessarily better.

 

If you see my post on this page (3), Halo 3 uses the HDD (if present). That increases the speed of data delivery. How much you wanna bet that this wasn't a one time implementation? ;)

 

Uses the HDD if present = non-mandatory installation.

 

Hello. you CAN'T have a mandatory installation if NO HDD exists, of course. You CAN have mandatory installations IF a HDD exists in EVERY console. We are talking about things that WOULD LEAD to the end result.

 

It's a non-mandatory installation so my point still stands that just because certain games have 360 optional installations, that doesn't make 360's drive performance look worse than the PS3's.

 



My Mario Kart Wii friend code: 2707-1866-0957