Sqrl on 19 April 2009
| ironman said: So the econoies's state is not substantial evedence? |
Sure. But evidence of what specifically? You have to link it to something with equally substantial evidence to each aspect of a set of policies for it to actually prove or disprove the validity of a given set of policies.
Again, I'm not disagreeing with you, I see things very similar to yourself but I don't see that there is the kind of overwhelming evidence of exactly what caused what and how much each thing effects the other.
 |
| To Each Man, Responsibility |
