By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
nightsurge said:
Jordahn said:
 

 

Ohhhh...  Now you want to try to paint the false picture that I'm upset just because I make points that you cannot successfully counter argue.  In fact you may not have noticed that several times I did a smiley face to show that I wasn't upset.  No, it's not sad for a franchise to sell better on one console than another regardless of history as I have already given you the logic of a larger userbase.  Why would this be an issue for gamers as long as the gamers have access to the game and the developer keeps making them while the console makes still gives a viable option?

;)

It is not sad for the developer, no.... or the gamers, no... but it is not good for Sony as a console maker.  That is undeniable.

I always countered your arguments.... usually by showing there was nothing to argue about.  All you were concentrating on was somehow painting a pciture of me as a fanboy.

The smilies you made were all lies... all of them!

 

It's good for SONY that the PS3 is still in the race, and it's undeniable that they are doing better than any console maker in third place in console history in part because of the software support.  I still don't see how it's so sad.  And you might have responed to my arguments, but you never countered anything.  You never proved how it's "sad."  You never proved how selling less on another console is not "sold well."  You never "countered" my 75% argument, and not accepting a response when it's legit is only blowing it off and not countering.  Oh, well.  I'm just glad console gaming is a joy in my life to where I don't have to resort to falsehoods for enjoyment.

Peace bro.  You need it.

:)



Hackers are poor nerds who don't wash.