nightsurge said:
Jordahn said:
nightsurge said:
GameAnalyser said:
why is SF iv not important, since it is not ur type of game? Well u can't ignore the fanbase it's got.
The future iterations still would thus mean more for both consoles. NFS undercover almost tied despite ps3 getting the lazier port of the game. And if Re5 had grossed about two times the way it did with Cod:WAW then i would've considered it instead of the fact that it would go past ps3 no's within few months.
There is no point of gathering all the games since the most of the games u would post would be those multiplatforms that received advantage from user-base in America outnumbering ps3 by 2:1
|
And RE5 and SF4 have no advantage in Japan where it is 3:1 in favor of PS3? So those count but my list wouldn't... I see. 
|
Not the point. But the issue here is that you are cherry picking just your personal preferences. Just because you "really don't see as something all important" doens't mean that that title didn't "sold well" on the PS3. See where your biasness gets in the way?
|
I'm cherry picking? I believe it was you two whom brought up these limited recent examples. I am merely commenting on it. And having a personal opinion does not make me bias or a fanboy. 
To the bolded: You left out the critical word "I" from that quote. I am allowed to have this opinion. I never once stated it was the opinion of others, or that because of my opinion everyone else had to also believe the way I did.
|
Whoa there buddy... You asked for examples. And now that you get them, you are discrediting them? Talk about cherry picking, even worst than that. You ask for something, and you get. But then you throw it out because you never wanted them in the first place. That's obvious biasness because you were expecting none, thinking there isn't any. But now that you received some, you decided to throw out the truth when given to you. Keep it up bud...
:D
