ssj12 said:
lol, i wasnt saying it is a mean/angry tone. And I agreed with him about what he said, it doesnt fully fit together. But I think theres enough info to start making a current model with the knowledge and work back with what we discover and theories. As we discover things we can exchange out theories with real facts. It would be an ever evolving task just like the protein folding@home. |
Except we can't work back. Scientists have been trying forever, and they get so far... and then... they have no clue.
It's pretty much.
Universe as it is now
???
Big Bang.
To work out the middle, we'd need to have a much better understand of our current universe, and a much better understanding of the big bang. At the very least to work out the middle we'd need to know either everything that encompasses the universe so we know the totality of universe. (Let alone have proper equation numbers on things like black holes so we'd know what went in... what went out, where that stuff went etc.).
OR we'd need to know the totality of the big bang so that we could know the results of the universe. Even then it gurantees nothing.
Sure someone could just make up a model that "works" with a super computer... but you can also do that with a graphics program and random guessing. It'd be just as right.
That's not even considering the other problems. Such things are still far beyond us. We just don't have a firm enough understand of the math of the universe to put it into code in my opinion.
In my opinion, doing what you would want to do would be like asking someone with rudimentry 4th grade math skills to solve one of those almost impossible to solve questions like one of Hilbert's problems that have been solved.
Even if you gave the 4th grader the correct answer, he wouldn't be able to work his way through it because he just doesn't grasp or even understand the concepts needed to "work through" the problem.
