| Final-Fan said: 1. YES!!! YESYESYESYES! AAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA FINALLY! |
A method of truth means "a way to gain truth (aka absolute knowledge)". E.g. A man doubts his informer that says the world is flat and he wonders how he can be sure of this. A method of truth is something we're mulling over in our head (call it of the realm of analyticals or, ambiguously, the realm of ideas), it's not something we're going out to discover in the world. Rather, the world is the thing we're hoping to discover in truth through a method.
Other methods of truth would be rationalism, constuctivism, "presuppositionalism" (ambiguous). I'm sure there are many many more proposed but actually I think they're all actually variations of sense data (ambiguously called "experience") and rationality.
Yes, having truth is contingent upon obtaining it lol. "Input" if you will.
Actually, I could certainly call sense data revelation in that sense. Again, I don't say sense data doesn't exist or has nothing to do with reality. It's the empiricist doctrine I argue against that says we can "use" sense data to gain "further information" of reality (i.e. what that sense data represents - such as any particular entity [part or whole] and what nature it may have).
Okami
To lavish praise upon this title, the assumption of a common plateau between player and game must be made. I won't open my unworthy mouth.







