| Maskedpainter said: Wow, simply wow. The title elitist doesn't even begin to describe this nonsense. Your avatar does justice to your positions though. Edit: Your side advocates the destruction of humanity, over population and failure to feed the masses of the world has more to do with the inability of societies to create a system which allows uncommon-unique people to develop ways to meet the needs of the people. More to do with governments then the amount of human beings on this planet. But that's a whole other issue. |
Gee, thanks for responding to each of my points individually. You sure did a lot of work!
Moved on to name calling did you?
Of course the title of elitist doesn't begin to descripe my thoughts, I don't even know what elitist means. I think we should reduce human population until we can fulfill the basic needs of all mankind, and make more room for further humans. Such a bad thing?
About the "Edit", what are you trying to say? I don't advocate the detruction of humanity, just the reduction. MY side doesn't advocate over population and failure to feed... Your side does. I agree it has more to do with government then the amount of humans, but less humans would help. I also agree that it's another issue.
