Maskedpainter said:
vlad321 said:
Maskedpainter said:
The only 'right' that actually exists is when it does not require or interfere with the right of another human being, hence the pro-choice crowd argues for the elimination of the rights of the child in favor for the parent. Anyone ever noticed how quick people are willing to defend the ability to murder children, yet get defensive if you try to defend those who cannot defend themselves? Maybe some folks here should actually begin to socialize and venture out into the real world because the disconnect they have with reality and their own moral compass is very disturbing.
What does make me smile though are the majority of people who argue pro choice policies are unlikely to reproduce themselves. Which if you're going to advocate the destruction of your own species then by all means don't continue your damaged gene pool.
|
Ok let's all be hoenst. Did anyone else laugh at how pathetic this post was when they read through it?
Pro Tip: It's not a child until it reaches a few years of age. It's not a baby until it's born. It's a fetus.
|
So, if it's not human, please explain to me what a fetus is?
Dog, cat, a bird even? You honestly cannot be serious. You think you laughed hard? Really now, the sheer stupidity of it's a fetus not a human argument shows the level of which people are willing to go to justify murder. A fetus is a human being in a stage in it's life, just like a child is, an adult and even death.
Maybe a fetus is a chicken even.
|
He said it wasn't a child.... You know child and human are two different word right?
Fetuses are humans, he didn't deny that.
