By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
puffy said:
How is this thread still going?

Wii is easier to develop for because it's older tech and can't show as much on screen which minimises the art which means it's quicker to make which means that game doesn't take as long to make which means that employees were paid less than for the HD game because they weren't working on that particular game for as long on Wii which means that Wii game costed less.

It doesn't matter that they still get paid afterwards on a new game, all that matters is that the Wii game costed less while it was being made compared to the HD game.

 

How is that all that matters? Is it fanboyism that blinds? I'm looking at the cost of development to the publisher as a whole if they switched totally to wii development as opposed to HD development. Some of you really need to read some intelligent posts made earlier. If ithe whole situation was as simple as petz costs less than PoP, I won't have bothered creating this thread



"Dr. Tenma, according to you, lives are equal. That's why I live today. But you must have realised it by now...the only thing people are equal in is death"---Johann Liebert (MONSTER)

"WAR is a racket. It always has been.

It is possibly the oldest, easily the most profitable, surely the most vicious. It is the only one international in scope. It is the only one in which the profits are reckoned in dollars and the losses in lives"---Maj. Gen. Smedley Butler