Rpruett said:
1.) Aren't you the guy who said he hates having to get up and mess with things? Thus why you had to have a 'nice' Blu-Ray remote for your PS3? Why then would disc swapping not bother you in this instance? Now it's not a big deal? 2.) Actually a further point. 3.) Is a pointless point. 4.) Ofcourse porting a game is relevant. Most often (Even in good ports) the ported version is atleast a tad bit worse than the original. (Unless it's ported extremely afterwards). You're more likely to see better game quality on the system in which the game is not ported on. (In this case PS3....In others 360).
Overall, I think it's merely fanboy conjecture that will determine which copy is the definitive version overall. I don't think the game will be lackluster on one console or another. I do think the PS3 will be 'better' on the purest sense but that the differences will be negligible. Me personally, I wouldn't consider getting it for my 360. It's just too big of a Japanese title that has always been on a Japanese console and originally was a PS3 exclusive to start. Quality points to the PS3 version of FF, IMHO. and the controls feel natural on a Sony machine. |
- If changing discs meant that every time I played the game I had to get up and change discs like every time I want to play my PS3 I have to get up and turn it on, then yes, multiple discs would bother me. Lucky for me, I probably have to do it probably twice, maybe three times at the most. That really isn't a big deal.
- blah
- bloo
- They aren't porting the game, it isn't relevant at the moment. Right now it's better to assume they're both going to be the same.








