For all you people saying that MadWorld would sell better on PS3/360...

[Demoki]

Torillian said:

bardicverse said:

mjc2021 said:

bardicverse said:
MadWorld wouldnt have sold better on the HD systems, its too far of a change graphically, and its not a sequel. There's been little proof of original IP doing well on HD systems. Madworld wouldve done just as poorly on the HD systems. HD gaming fans are set in their ways and would have shunned it regardless.

You failed to mention the lack of success has much to do with leaving Mario out. They should have got rid of the blood... maybe have rainbows and flowers fly out instead. I'm also hearing there isn't minigames.

Funny that you call madworld a lack of success, when its already proven profitable, thus the definition of a success to a business.

 

btw, no one, and I mean no one on this site is going to take you seriously until you fill out info like age, location etc. Im assuming you're an angsty 16 year old otherwise, and not worth the time to take you seriously

 

Sega calling the sales "encouraging" does not directly equate to "we made money".  Did they make another statement on the topic that was more explicit, or is this just extrapolation of a single statement?

 

As above, Cancerous tumour reducing in size is encouraging.  Doesnt mean it is a success yet.