Arguments Against God

[Strategyking92]

@ wessle

Sometimes I feel like you don't know what you are arguing against, or you just don't pay attention. Here's what I said earlier:

"So god is human-like if you believe in the bible. However, he is also presented as an omniscient being, while having interest in a select few individuals. You could, however, make the argument that he needed to have interest in these individuals for people to have faith that he exists through religion spreading. As for god being cruel in the old testament, he was only testing humanity and punishing the wicked."

"While i'm not so sure about that, the evolution theory, and the creation theory have possibilities in them that humans were made in gods image. Well, they don't refute them. I mean, what if humans gradually changed into gods image? But because god doesn't have a physical image, you might compare his form to a cloud. Up close it looks like nothing, but from far away it might look like a dragon or something. I just don't think anybody can possibly imagine the big picture of a god, or how one can exist."

So I believe god is an omniscient being, and that he made humans in his image, yet we cannot know what he truly looks like. In all honesty, his image could just be what he wants mankind to represent, and he can have many images. Or it could just be the human interpretation.

And regarding technology: we would not only have to alter our DNA.. But also our environment. And considering the human condition, wars are only inevitable, meaning progress will eventually be lost again. The dark ages say "Konnichiwa!" But because eventually a civilization will make enough progress to make great strides in those fields you mentioned, we would be able to do somethi9ng similar. But the chances of it happening in this wide open universe are minute.