Ascended_Saiyan3 said:
Zizzla_Rachet said:
Here are the numbers as reported by our very own VG Charts..
Kill Zone 2 1.37m
Gears Of War 2 4.77m
What is the point of this argument, oh now I remember....I'm supposed to pick..I have played both...KZ2 on my little brother's PS3 and GoW2 on my 360...GoW2 wins because the elements in it's campaign are way more complex to develop...also...KZ2 is a completely new engine and was in development way longer so why is it only marginally better?? (if it is..I don't think it is.) any way....I would like for all Sony fans to stop it...just stop your charge to console war victory and start buying games...and Call of Duty 4 does not count...I mean seriously!!! Lost Planet was not worth your time?...and thank you for a great comparison and unbiased..only thing i hated was the the first GoW2 pic you chose was the redux of the old multiplayer GridLock Stage but you apologize for that...
|
I can tell you don't even know what you're saying, so I won't even touch the technical differences. Just look at the side by side Youtube video (in HD) "Lens of Truth: Gears of War 2 vs Killzone 2 engine". If that's what you consider "marginally better", there is no hope for you. BTW, Gears 2 leverages the tech created since BEFORE Gears 1 came out. Killzone 2 was in development for 3.5 years (just outside the average development time). |
In the end KillZone 2 looks better than Gears....I can accept that I played both games...but the Unreal 3 is relatively new...and im sure developers get to look before things get told to the public.....
