Pristine20 said:
So basically, ps3 is more expensive to develop for relative to ps2 because developers CHOOSE to put more detail and thus, more time into their ps3 projects? Note the keyword "CHOOSE". PS3 isn't intrinsically more expensive to develop for...it's individual developers that raise their own costs. No one will assassinate Nomura & Co if FFXIII didn't look as good as it does. Millions would still buy the game. It's the devs themselves that are creating their own problems. MH3 could have released on ps3 with the graphics and thus, time spent for release on wii. It's capcom who decided that since they can spend RE5 time on MH3, it should be a wii game. To blame the PS3 and 360 for these rising costs doesn't make sense to me. It's devs that chose to raise the costs by themselves by competing to say "hey, mine looks better than yours" which is why we have our current problem. If you can't afford the time (and thus, money), don't do it...simple and short. PS360 provide flexibility i.e you can do whatever you want as opposed to the graphical glass celing on wii for graphics-focused studios. Sony and M$ don't refuse licenses for games that aren't graphical powerhouses.
|
You can see it as a choice, or as pretty much an obligation in the never-ending graphics arms race. It would be quite interesting to see what would happen if someone made a PS3 game with Wii graphics, but seriously which publisher is going to do that?
My Mario Kart Wii friend code: 2707-1866-0957







