Does Nintendo get too much credit for saving videogames?

[Onimusha12]

Legend11 said:

Onimusha12 said:

So Wikipedia is a credible source now, and a factor that should be weighed above all other facets of reality? If they present one view on something that must be the only view and of course the agreed upon view right? In fact Wikipedia seems to not really so much support or dismiss your claims but really just show that the game was popular for unanmed reasons.

Or were you just hoping to intimidate me with a giant wall of quoted text?

That text backs up what I said and has lots of links as well.  So you lost this one, better luck next time.

It's Wikipedia, you fail for even suggesting it is in any way a credible or tie breaking source. 

Would you also care to explain how this text backs up what you said anymore than what I said, or are you just  going to cop out on the "I provided quoted quoted text so I win" defense?

Legend 11's sure fire way to win an argument.

1. Make a claim.

2. Back said claim with a Wikipedia article regardless its relevance.

3. Insist that Wikipedia article made you the winner even though you refuse to defend it or explain why.

4. There, victory: no logic, burden of proof or relevancy needed.

---------------------