shio said:
When Valve went to Microsoft to propose them their Digital Distribution concept, Microsoft said to them that such Digital Distribution Service was 10 years too early... you know what Valve did? They made Steam without Microsoft's help! HAHAHAHA Thank God!
|
Yeah, but just because Valve were right doesn't mean this lot are. Steam seemed perfectly sensible at the time (at least to me) both in terms of concept and infrastructure. Also Valve, apart from the wobble with Half Life 2, have been good are carefully building the service and letting it grow.
OnLive is promising massive jumps right from the start, with hard to believe claims technically and a much more dubious position with reference to infrastructure - at least IMHO.
Still, at least Steam is great.
Try to be reasonable... its easier than you think...







