| vaio said:
Not all hackers are media whores most prefer to work in the dark, at least most of them I´ve worked with (back in the day I was into this stuff personally) and the people I know today work in the same way. They do it to see if they can not if they can get famous. Not every hacker is like dark alex or wanincko. To show proof of concept wouldn´t you have to have the hack to work as flawlessly as possible? and as I state before I´ve tried it it works and even online works but the longest i´ve played is 20-30 min ( my friend has actually managed to play for almost a whole hour without crash) then it crashes and that´s not something anyone would want to show to the world. A fact you might find interesting is for y friend to get this far he managed to brick 4 PS3 and I imagine that is another hurdle for the hackers to try and overcome since the PS3 is so expensive and it is a very costly hobby for thoose working on this as many more then him have bricked their PS3 on their way to solve the problems their are facing.
|
This is BS.
It was BS last year when we told you that you were saying useless nonsense, and it still is.
The hackers who are not media whores would be the first to put their finding out there on some dedicated ML or IRC channel. Since when do they wait for it to work "perfectly" to tell the world they cracked sth ?
You weren't credible last year, you still aren't now.
Besides, what's the point of saying "it's cracked but nobody knows about it" ? This is stupid BS already.
Get it right: either it's cracked and lots of people know about it, or it's not. "It's cracked by someone nobody knows about, in his basement, I've seen it" doesn't count.
