By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Infinity said:

Ganbare_Goemon said:
This is just a big, ridiculous joke. I prefer to think this way.

I think the PS3 is, actually, one of the *worst* consoles ever. I have some "proofs":

- It was released one year after the 360, with the promise to bring graphics that no one could even imagine. More than 2 years later, it still didn't show anything better than 360 could do. And if your opinion says some games couldn't run on the 360, you must admit the difference is almost null. I think just this reason is enough.

Killzone 2

And the PS3 cannot run Kameo, so its moot.

 

- It is very expensive, just because of a Blu-Ray drive wich still doesn't make ANY difference for games.

You get what you pay for. I do not like swapping discs!

Get a PC, do a no disc crack for all your games. It will make you very happy. Also get rid of the DVD/CD collection and use a media centre PC.

 

- It has been losing most of its exclusive titles for 360 and even the Wii.

I have dozens of games and the majority are PS3 exclusives.

 There are over a dozen exclusives worth owning? You must have a lot of games.

- The so called High Definition gaming is translated into a just a few games that can run 1080p.

Your point? Zero 360 and Wii titles run at 1080p. Some running at 1080p on PS3 is better than none.

Very few titles on the PS3 actually run at 1920/1080. 90% of those are PSN games...

 

- It managed to instantly ruin Sony's gaming division, coming from a record-breaking market share to what we can consider a failure (judging by sales difference).

Irrelevent. Some of the best consoles ever made were not the best selling.

Market share = game library

 

Now, Sony Fanboys still dream that someday the PS3 will use its "full power". All I can say is: wouldn't it have been better if it showed more power from the beginning? I mean, when (and if) it reaches its "full potential", Pc gaming will be so much powerful (already is, PS3 was never better) it won't even be noticed, except for some people who will say :"Wow, if only the PS3 launch titles were like this". For me, the will to see producers making use of PS3's full power two or three years from now seems as exciting as if I somehow discovered gold on the moon and someone told me I would be able to go there and get it when I'm 70 yr old.

I mean, wasn't the PS3 all about the graphical power? Well, there has always been something better on PC. Does anyone think the PS3 would be able to run Crysis?

Why not?

512 MB ram total, low spec GPU?

 

 

 

 



Tease.