| Soleron said: No, Microsoft is technically not a monopoly. Every school in my country, under government rules, is forced to have Windows and Office. This is because software can only come from certain approved vendors and no non-MS supplier is on that list. My school IT department says it's illegal not to have Internet Explorer, and suspended me for installing Firefox. "Now could you imagine the uproar if Microsoft attempted to lock out developers from using Windows unless they licensed it and could only produce an amount that Microsoft allowed? What about if the developers were also forced to sign an agreement not to develop for any other operating system?" The amount of unethical and illegal stuff they've done is huge. Look up Linuxpatent threats, interfering with the standardisation of OOXML, bundling of Internet Explorer and Windows Media Player, etc., etc. |
See that part 5 put in red for you? It's a barrier of entry. It's not the only one. The two ingredients for monopolies are barriers of entry and a single company controlling most or all of the market. MS = monopoly.
You do not have the right to never be offended.







