Onimusha12 on 25 September 2007
So Wikipedia is a credible source now, and a factor that should be weighed above all other facets of reality? If they present one view on something that must be the only view and of course the agreed upon view right? In fact Wikipedia seems to not really so much support or dismiss your claims but really just show that the game was popular for unanmed reasons.
Or were you just hoping to intimidate me with a giant wall of quoted text?
