HappySqurriel said:
On globalization ... The workforce in the western world has become a highly educated very expensive workforce and the only way to justify the cost of labour their productivity has to be dramatically higher than their third world competition; or their education must allow them to do work that can't be done by offshore labour. Unfortunately, unions and politicians have no interest in producing the best long term results and there has been a healthy stream of subsidies (and constant threats of strikes) in order to ensure that companies maintain the least productive workforce possible. Had we began focusing on ensuring that our manufacturing workforce was as productive as possible 50 years ago most people who worked in manufacturing today would be highly skilled machinists (or similarly skilled workers) and the work done by these people would be worth their cost. The truth is that we didn't and today you can pay a GM employee $77 per hour in wages and benefits or you can pay a worker in China $2.50 per hour and get similar results.
|
I don't have a problem with that kind of globalisation, TBH. You can pay a guy in a developing country 2.50 an hour because over there the average daily wage might be 20 bucks or something anyways; which would be a decent living compared to the costs there.
The only thing I would want those companies to do is to follow some sort of basic human work standard guidelines where you're only allowed to work people X hours a day, X days a week, etc. etc. Those companies are already saving boatloads of money by outsourcing; they should have a couple bucks to spare to provide those workers with clean, safe, working conditions.








