Solid proof the PS3 is a better system

[Ganbare_Goemon]

This is just a big, ridiculous joke. I prefer to think this way.

I think the PS3 is, actually, one of the *worst* consoles ever. I have some "proofs":

- It was released one year after the 360, with the promise to bring graphics that no one could even imagine. More than 2 years later, it still didn't show anything better than 360 could do. And if your opinion says some games couldn't run on the 360, you must admit the difference is almost null. I think just this reason is enough.

- It is very expensive, just because of a Blu-Ray drive wich still doesn't make ANY difference for games.

- It has been losing most of its exclusive titles for 360 and even the Wii.

- The so called High Definition gaming is translated into a just a few games that can run 1080p.

- It managed to instantly ruin Sony's gaming division, coming from a record-breaking market share to what we can consider a failure (judging by sales difference).

Now, Sony Fanboys still dream that someday the PS3 will use its "full power". All I can say is: wouldn't it have been better if it showed more power from the beginning? I mean, when (and if) it reaches its "full potential", Pc gaming will be so much powerful (already is, PS3 was never better) it won't even be noticed, except for some people who will say :"Wow, if only the PS3 launch titles were like this". For me, the will to see producers making use of PS3's full power two or three years from now seems as exciting as if I somehow discovered gold on the moon and someone told me I would be able to go there and get it when I'm 70 yr old.

I mean, wasn't the PS3 all about the graphical power? Well, there has always been something better on PC. Does anyone think the PS3 would be able to run Crysis?