crumas2 said:
I would take your argument one step further and say that there are *three* ways in which the rich contribute in a free society, economically speaking. They tend to do it via taxes (however low they may be), voluntary contributions (charity), and re-investment in the infrastructure (starting companies, investing large sums via stocks, venture capital for new startups, etc.). But the "disenfranchised" don't seem to see it that way. All they see is someone with a lot of money who doesn't pay as much into their own pocket as they would like. Take away the surplus money of the rich, and the economy will suffer greatly over time. This was explained by many of the founding fathers, but we seem to have forgotten what they taught us. |
Quoted for truth, especially the last sentence.








