ramses01 said:
That is an incorrect analogy. MS isn't forcing anyone to do anything. They are simply exercising control over the approved use of their products to protect their brand. The customer elects, or not, to purchase the license. MS is saying to the customer, netbook manufacturers, I will sell this specific version of an OS designed and priced for Netbooks. However, as a condition of that sale only products meeting these characteristics are eligible for that price and feature set. This prevents cannibalization of the full OS market on laptops. |
You're assuming that netbook manufacturers have the choice to say "No". But they don't. If they said that, they would be charged full price (>$100 instead of $30) for Windows Vista instead and thus would go out of business in competition with those who accepted the deal. If they didn't offer any version of Windows then they wouldn't sell many netbooks because Windows is all the consumer knows due to the existing desktop monopoly.
So it's accept the deal or don't make netbooks profitably.







