Jordahn said:
superchunk said:
CGI-Quality said:
superchunk said:
I don't want to read 4 pages of stuff, so my comment is this.
If Sony's 1st and 2nd party base is so much bigger, by be extension better, than MS and Nintendo combined, then why is it Nintendo is the only company that can carry their entire company solely of their software?
Why is it Nintendo made more profits from gaming than MS and/or Sony for every single year any of them has ever made video games?
Why is it Nintendo, who makes games on at most 2 platforms, is only 2nd to EA in publishing when EA makes games on every single possible platform there is to be found?
Why is it Nintendo never has to wonder if their game will be a million seller? Its usually will their game break 3m. 1m is almost a certainty.
More does not equate to better. PS1 and PS2 did not become the best selling home consoles of their times (and all time) because Sony makes great games. They sold so well because Sony worked very well with 3rd parties and retained a TON of great exclusives.
On the other hand, Wii is a massive success and will easily claim the crown from PS2 almost solely on Nintendo's software as most 3rd parties have only just begun to actually put forth solid efforts.
There is no better software maker than Nintendo. Its multiple decades of massive hits and record breaking titles prove this beyond a doubt. |
Too bad with this post it's clear you missed the entire point of the article. No where in the article did Sony say more = better.
|
But that is the point. Sony wouldn't mention that they have so many more dev teams than their competitors if they were not trying to imply that they were overall a better dev house. My post demonstrates that while they may have more in quantity they are far inferior in quality to specifically Nintendo.
|
There was NOTHING that you said that "proved" that SONY "are far inferior in quality to specifically Nintendo."
Edit: Did anything I said when I first responded to you (in red text) proved untrue?
|
I didn't 'proved' anything. I 'demonstrated'. Big difference. If you disagree with that, so be it. But, I didn't state it was fact or proved.
