Rpruett said:
Not really. I prefer the PS3 to the 360. But game enjoyment is purely a matter of personal opinion. Price clearly favors the 360 in terms of entry point. Reliability clearly favors the PS3 and Value I guess 'could maybe be' a tad biased. But the PS3 does give you a Blu-Ray player, WiFi, Free Online for $400. Add those costs onto the cheapest 360 model and include XBL fees.
|
Ok but, if we are talking about a gaming machine, I don't care about blu-ray, wifi (useless for gaming) etc...
A pure gamer would rather spend money into gaming rather than electronics...
IMO, this "value argument" is a Sony marketing spin : Real value is about getting more for less money, not getting more for more because... you just paid for it, that is no added-value... people on this forum don't understand that apparently...
360 has more value : It is the most succesful HD console on the market and it is available with crazy bundles..that is value to me: You wanna play ? You get the console and 2 AAA titles for 290 € or a HALO Pack for 260 €.
I have no problem with people willing to pay more for blu-ray... but this is not gaming related..(and don't come on me with the advantage of BR on gaming...this is just storage..).
Evan Wells (Uncharted 2): I think the differences that you see between any two games has much more to do with the developer than whether it’s on the Xbox or PS3.