Khuutra said:
You are not following me. What I am saying is that the End User License Agreement is written in order to agree with copyright law for the region in which it is issued. That is why some (even most) EULAs are never challenged - because they do not come into conflic with copyright law. Copyright law determines what the EULA says. I'm not arguing on that point. |
No, you are not following me. There has been a precedent case(not sure about the word) about validity of those agreements. Result was that EULA does not define the right to use your media. BECAUSE in that case, it did not comply with the Finnish law. If EULA says that you can not make a copy and local law says you can, EULA is nothing but a piece of toilet paper. I told you what Finnish law says about your rights..







